US Open ticket policy needs investigation

Last post 08-17-2008, 5:21 PM by joey474. 22 replies.
Page 2 of 2 (23 items)   < Previous 1 2
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  07-22-2008, 5:35 PM 310043 in reply to 309980

    Re: US Open ticket policy needs investigation

    RP:
    It is really shortsighted on their part that they built that huge stadium without a roof. Hindsight is 20/20 but I remember during construction they gave media and ticket holders guided tours and that was pretty much the first question everyone asked: where's the roof? To which they said (then) that since it rarely rains during the two weeks of the Open they felt they did not need it. But what a waste when you see over the weekend, for instance, Arthur Ashe stadium hosted the WNBA NY Liberty. If they had a roof they could have hosted more events like that, concerts (memo to the USTA: just don't play any 70s or 80s music or risk the wrath of Vinko!), conventions, etc. They spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a stadium that is way too big for tennis (you sit upstairs you can hear the rumbling of the 7 train more clearly than the bounce of the ball) that essentially goes unused for 48 weeks a year. The Key Biscayne stadium that hosts the Sony ERicsson Open is a much more intimate setting and they add the bleacher seats upstairs for the tournament. But as everyone here says: it's almost pointless to go into Arthur Ashe Stadium the first week of the Open and it has almost zero atmosphere because die-hard fans are all on the outer courts so your'e stuck with a half-full cavernous monstrosityand on TV it looks like no one cares about the Open when the reality is the outer courts are packed for week one. But let's face it: it's all about the corporate luxury boxes - that's where they're making the money. The annual rent from those luxury boxes, the concession (each has a bar, food, staffed by employees, etc.). You're right: it is silly that no one there had the foresight to build a smaller stadium with a roof. It's funny because when I meet people who are attending the Open for the first time they all want to go into Ashe Stadium and then they actually sit there for a match and just as quickly wanna get out of there and go to the Grandstand or other outer courts where they can actually see a match. Other sports are learning bigger is not necessarily better. The Mets' new stadium which is nearly finished across the street from Ashe will be nearly 10,000 seats smaller than the current Shea Stadium. First time I ever sat in Centre Court at Wimbledon could not believe how much more intimate it was in person than it appears on TV. Unfortunately, Ashe Stadium is the opposite.

    All of which points out how poorly the USTA runs not only the US Open, but the sport as a whole.

    And not just the professional part of tennis in the U.S. Anyone who has tried to get information from them on leagues, etc. know they are extraordinarily unhelpful.  Last year, I wanted to go to the linesperson training being held in NH just before the Pilot Pen tournament to see if I would like it.  I contacted them TWO months in advance.  I emailed them twice to see what was up.  Guess when they contacted me with all the details?  The NIGHT BEFORE the training. lol!  Would have been okay, but they required an all white outfit - I don't have all white anything for tennis apparel. 

    They are killing the sport in the U.S.  The only way the sport will survive is if they get better people running not only the USTA, but ATP and ITF.

    Which reminds me - no one is talking about the Hamburg trial that started yesterday.  That should be interesting.

  •  07-22-2008, 5:49 PM 310055 in reply to 310043

    Re: US Open ticket policy needs investigation

    NicoFan:

       I'm very, very surprised the ATP has not been able to settle with Hamburg (they have met twice to try to settle, but no agreement reached) because in a sense it's like betting all your fortune on one number in roulette: they lose this case and it could blow up the entire ATP as it is currently constructed - at the very least signal a seismic shift in the leadership. I'm not a lawyer and from what I've read and heard there are hundreds of thousands of pages of documents in the case, however just seems like an immense gamble on their part that could have been avoided. And as Richard Evans has pointed out in his reports on the case: Hamburg has already invested so much money in legal fees (they are backed by Qatari tennis federation) and obviously have every reason in the world to keep fighting because of they lose the case they're effectively finished as a top draw tournament. Difficult to say without knowing all of the details, but certainly seems like the ATP could have and should have found a way to settle because its power base is basically on the line should Hamburg win. Above and beyond those practical reasons they also come off as a poor partner in bouncing an event that has a 100+-year history and has supported the tour since its inception.
     

  •  07-22-2008, 6:37 PM 310071 in reply to 310055

    Re: US Open ticket policy needs investigation

    There is something worse for tennis than 1970s music-getting litigators, especially from large corporate law firms, involved. Once these characters are through mining every nook and cranny of the tennis bank account, we'll be lucky if there is a can of tennis balls left for the Open. Maybe if we're fortunate they will leave a carton of Tretorns for the Open.
  •  07-22-2008, 6:41 PM 310077 in reply to 310055

    Re: US Open ticket policy needs investigation

    I'm surprised too that they didn't settle beforehand.

    There definitely will be a huge impact on the ATP if they lose.  And I don't think that it is an exaggeration that it could mean the end of the ATP as we know it. 

  •  07-23-2008, 3:21 AM 310469 in reply to 310077

    Re: US Open ticket policy needs investigation

    The judicial system really  should  not  be involved in determining what tournaments are top tier and what tournaments are not. This  case  should  be tossed out  of court. A few  years   ago a low level  judge in New York decided what boat would  be made  the  winner of the America's Cup and  what the  rules would  be. NY's  highest court  ruled  that the judge was way  out of line and had  no business getting involved with a sporting  event. The judges in the ATP  case  should declare this a matter  beyond their jurisdiction  and expertise.    
  •  08-15-2008, 1:36 AM 324679 in reply to 306166

    Re: US Open ticket policy needs investigation

    i smell rat with this ticket partner thing. at any rate, i'm a fan (not a scalper) and have an extra pair of tickets for sessions 10 and 12 avaialble for sale (at my cost). each pair is $85.00 (for both, not each). email me if interested to jrios@stny.rr.com

    tickets are upper promenade row N.

  •  08-17-2008, 1:02 AM 326225 in reply to 324679

    Re: US Open ticket policy needs investigation

    Which days are those? I have to see if I can get those days off and get back east.
  •  08-17-2008, 5:21 PM 326582 in reply to 326225

    Re: US Open ticket policy needs investigation

    session 10 is friday 8/29, session 12 is saturday 8/30, both 7pm evening sessions....
Page 2 of 2 (23 items)   < Previous 1 2
View as RSS news feed in XML