vinko:In fairness to Boris, Germany's tax collectors are vicious fanatics who want to make a name for themselves by bringing down a famous person. They are relentless and they do not want to hear anything that disagrees with them. They have forced most of Germany's athletes and entertainers to flee the country. Boris could have stayed in Monaco and out of their clutches but he made the mistake of returning home and once he did that they said anything he ever earned in his life belonged to them. To Germany's tax collectors Boris was like an elephant suddenly parking himself in front of a hunter armed with a telescope and a high powered shot gun. They were out for big game and they got it.
I lived in Europe for over 15 years, seven of them in Germany, the rest in Austria and Switzerland. Germany has one of the most liberal and lenient legal systems in the world, perhaps as overcompensation for its horrific past in which the judicial branch served Adolf. Athletes don't flee the country, they merely take advantage of residency laws that result in significant tax breaks for the wealthy who live outside of Germany (and can document that) for at least 10-11 months out of the year. Maximum in-residence tax for Germans is comparable to US rates and that's before deductions. So to state that they are driven out is patently absurd! Becker was actually spared (but could have been imprisoned and was close to being incarcerated based on the facts relating to his case) by this very liberal system (in Germany Wesley Snipes and other celebrity tax dodgers would never have been imprisoned). He claimed residency in Monte Carlo but it was clear that he was spending most of his time in Munich.
The US IRS is much more draconian; just look at the recent UBS incident. Moreover, the USA and Switzerland (surprisingly) are the only top 20 nation members who have dual-taxation laws in place to prevent such exoduses. Americans, for example, cannot live in Monte Carlo or elsewhere to avoid paying taxes in the USA, there is an annual $70,000.00 deduction for expatriates and that's is. That's why there are no American top athletes legally residing in Monte Carlo and other tax havens; because, at most, they would receive a $70,000.00 deduction (capped at annually), peanuts to someone making millions, and those millions would be taxed in the USA, irrespective of where a citizen (athlete or whomever) or even legal resident of the USA resides. By constrast, German and other EU, Asian and Austrailian/South African elite athletes who reside in Monte Carlo and like-tax governed nations enjoy massive tax breaks so long as they can document being out of their country of legal residency for whatever stipulated time period since there is no income tax in these havens and non-resident citizens are not double taxed (as Americans and Swiss are).
That's why German athletes and super earners live in Monte Carlo and elsewhere. This also explains why Federer remains a legal resident of Switzerland since no matter where he lives he is liable, as an American would be, to double-taxation (which is also ironic since Switzeland is also known as being a tax haven, with one Kanton [Zurs] having the most favorable tax situations for foreigners; but not for its own nationals [a small country like Switzerland needs all of the tax revenue that it can get from its citizens just like big countries, come to think of it, who are notorious for squandering revenue]).
Ironically, this state of affairs makes the USA less competitive when it comes to international business and especially hiring by multi-national concerns who are forced to excessively compensate Americans that they hire to make up for the double tax hit that they are subjected to. This dual-taxation situation results in international firms hiring less Americans for overseas assignments.