Anyone spare a thought for Nadal the kind of ghost of this tournament

Last post 07-02-2009, 12:40 AM by RP. 2 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  07-02-2009, 12:10 AM 479465

    Anyone spare a thought for Nadal the kind of ghost of this tournament

    Honestly I really worry about Nadal and his future and cannot get last year's final out of my mind. I want Murray to win if only to break the lock Rafa and Fed have on the majors but to deal with the tendinitis (Darren Cahill says the pain drove him out of the game)  one hopes he does not even try the hard court season. I think Fed is playing much freer because he does not have Nadal in his head and I think Nadal was very much in Fed's head these past three years and rightly so. It is silly to speculate what might have been but it cannot be much fun for Nadal to watch Federer marching along while he is in physio and itching to come back and be number one again.
  •  07-02-2009, 12:18 AM 479466 in reply to 479465

    Re: Anyone spare a thought for Nadal the kind of ghost of this tournament

    Peggye1:
    Honestly I really worry about Nadal and his future and cannot get last year's final out of my mind. I want Murray to win if only to break the lock Rafa and Fed have on the majors but to deal with the tendinitis (Darren Cahill says the pain drove him out of the game)  one hopes he does not even try the hard court season. I think Fed is playing much freer because he does not have Nadal in his head and I think Nadal was very much in Fed's head these past three years and rightly so. It is silly to speculate what might have been but it cannot be much fun for Nadal to watch Federer marching along while he is in physio and itching to come back and be number one again.

     

    Peggy

     

    I do not think Nadal is the ghost of the tournament. Yes he was the defending champ. But I mean he won it once. Once.  With Murray mania, and Fed and Roddick et al. I don't think he is missed that much at all.

     

    I also don't think Federer is playing freer because Nadal isn't there. I mean if Nadal had spanked Roger at Wimbledon the way he did in Paris last year, that would be one thing. But Rafa won by the slimmest of margins. Grass still favors Federer. And he had the extra motivation of wanting revenge and regaining his title.  

     

    It will be great when Nadal comes back.  But as you have said he will always have those knee issues. Injuries are a fact of life for pro athletes.

  •  07-02-2009, 12:40 AM 479468 in reply to 479465

    Re: Anyone spare a thought for Nadal the kind of ghost of this tournament

    No question his absence created opportunity and I don't think it's a coincidence that the veterans are the ones who took advantage of it. The guys who have been around a bit and seen the Rafa-Roger dominance and with him out of the event it had to serve as motivation.

    Cahill told the anecdote about the pain from his tendinitis being so bad (despite daily icing for nearly 3 years) that he was actually in tears from the pain one day boarding a plane. Hope that his case is not as severe but from what I'm told by a couple of specialists: rest is the best remedy. I would think he's really got to consider cutting down the length of his practice time or doing more off court training. Patrick McEnroe told the story about Nadal practing 4-5 hours a day the week leading up to last September's Davis Cup semifinal. I would think he's got to cut that down just to reduce the strain on his knees.

    I've never had knee problems, but a few friends who played college sports have and I know one guy who was a college basketball player with chronic tendinitis (he's been out of college about 15 years now) who can't even really run without pain - and this is from 4 years playing college ball, not 7 + years at the pro level. Did you read the NY Times Magazine piece on Nadal a couple of weeks ago?

    A few comments in there from Nadal's doctor, Angel Ruiz-Cotorro, and from Uncle Toni really stood out. When Ruiz-Cotorro said "more speed, bigger problems..." (alluding to the speed of the game and the speed with which Nadal plays) and when he said: "For an athlete like this, the word 'rest' does not exist...."

    Asked Courier about his own experiences (he never had knee problems, but had the dead arm issue) and he said in retrospect he feels he would have been better off cutting back on his own training or at least reducing the length/intensity but when you get to No. 1 through such hard work there's a tendency to try to work even harder when things are not going as well which can be counter-productive in the long run.

    The other interesting point was Uncle Toni was talking about Nadal's serve and acknowleding the fact that he's a righty playing lefty does inhibit his serve: "It's possible he'd be serving better if he played right-handed. Throwing the ball perfectly is hard for him and he doesn't always hit it at the correct height. The whole thing is just not something he does very well. We're working on it," Uncle Toni told the Times.

    His serve is definitely much improved from his early days and to me if he can develop that more extreme lefty slice out wide on the ad side that could make his life a lot easier by helping him shorten up the points. Uncle Toni's comments kind of echo what McEnroe has said for a long time that maybe because he isn't a natural lefty he can never fully develop that biting slice wide that McEnroe had that even guys like Korda, Leconte, Forget, etc. could exploit. If the tendinitis is going to be a long-term issue then hope he can pick up his serve even more to shorten points. Seems like if he can do that and manage his schedule and training time would be beneficial.

    The good news is he probably will only play 2 hard-court events before the Open so assuming he does come back for Montreal then he'll have had more than 2 months of rest. Then the question is how do the knees hold up playing Montreal, Cincy, US Open in succession?

View as RSS news feed in XML